![]() ![]() But is that an accurate comparison? Shouldn’t we compare the total cost of these solutions, apples to apples? core hour, cloud really doesn’t seem efficient. “It’s so much more expensive than running on my local hardware,” said one researcher. Advantages like these enable organizations to be higher-performing, more resilient, and stable.īut not everyone is convinced that cloud is the end-all solution. “We found 3x faster speeds when running certain workflows on GPU’s,” I recently heard from an engineer in aerospace. “We can accelerate development, react to changes in the market to capitalize quickly on new opportunities.”įlexible and agile business critical systems like Azure offer additional advantages outside of scale, they also offer specialized hardware. The resources are there when we need them and gone when we don’t,” he said. “In contrast to on-premises hardware, the cloud grows and shrinks based on our stage of product development. While an organization may have unmet needs with its on-premises infrastructures, the on-demand resources available through Microsoft Azure provide capacity and scale that solve critical business issues. Do you sacrifice innovation and competitive edge to appease the bottom line?Ĭloud computing, on the other hand, is poised to eliminate this friction, delivering the competitive edge companies require to be a market leader. Underutilized hardware is wasteful, and so is reduced cycles in engineering and design. “And at times our demand is fairly unpredictable.”Īll too common is this tension between R&D teams and IT managing business critical resources. So why don’t IT teams invest in more robust business critical systems? “Expanding our cluster is non-trivial, it requires time, space, resources, delivery time, and most of all, a lot of capital,” said the HPC leader. We often hear from engineers, “If I had additional resources, I could do more tests, more iterations, and better designs.” Unfortunately, static business critical systems like HPC can stunt progress within an organization. Eventually, this business critical system could not keep pace and they frequently faced slow completions. It’s honestly what makes us a company.” With innovation in the front seat, his company invested in an HPC environment to support the design and testing process. “Ultimately, it’s our fundamental ability to innovate that sets us apart.” he said, “That’s what sells our product and builds our brand. This process consists of many iterations on each aspect of their design, then thorough testing. Success requires that he and his team hit strict requirements for performance and safety. He told me how their engineers are working tirelessly towards a launch that will revolutionize the auto industry. This truth was recently on my mind as I interviewed the HPC leader at an automotive company. The reason for such a drastic change is the ability of companies to innovate. By 2016 that number shrank to 24 years, and by 2027 the average tenure will be a mere 12 years. ![]() In 1964 the average tenure of companies on the S&P 500 was 33 years. It’s becoming ever more challenging for companies to remain competitive in their industries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |